Patients are currently filing lawsuits with allegations that hernia mesh manufacturers have created defective medical devices and have failed to warn patients and doctors of the potential health complications adequately. These lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers such as Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Atrium Medical Corp.
The claims from patients are complaints that the hernia mesh used for their hernia surgeries have caused health issues such as chronic pain, infection, adhesions, hernia recurrence, bowel perforation, bowel obstruction, mesh migration, mesh rejection, and more. Some patients are required to undergo hernia revision surgery.
If you have experienced any of these symptoms due to hernia revision surgery, then contact KBA Attorneys for professional legal assistance.
This hernia mesh manufacturer created the 3DMax hernia mesh. The 3DMax was put on the market in 2009 and is made up of a material called polypropylene. The 3DMax did not have to go through pre-market studies and was approved in October 2008 through the 510(k) program.
Bard claims that the 3DMax Mesh is fixation-free, easy to position, and reduces pain for patients. However, the polypropylene material has been known to cause many health complications such as chronic pain, mesh migration, and mesh rejection. Some patients even require additional surgery.
C.R. Bard’s Composix Kugel Mesh was another defective medical device manufactured by the company that was recalled. This particular product was recalled in 2005, 2006, and 2007. There have been a plethora of lawsuits involving Kugel Mesh and millions of dollars have been paid in jury awards and settlements.
Other hernia mesh products that have been repeatedly recalled include:
Many Bard Lawsuits are being filed with allegations of the company selling defective hernia mesh. These lawsuits are in state and federal courts all over the country. If you have experience complications because of a C.R. Bard hernia mesh medical device, then contact a professional attorney today.
Ethicon is a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, and in 2016, Ethicon recalled their Physiomesh flexible composite hernia mesh. This was due to studies that monitored the progress of patients with the Physiomesh. Results showed a higher rate of revision surgery or hernia recurrence in patients using the Physiomesh.
This defective medical device was also approved through the 510(k) program, allowing the sale of a composite hernia mesh without clinical trials or studies establishing its safety. Ethicon released a safety notice that lists and provides details on specific hernia mesh devices that were subject to recall. The hernia mesh manufacturer also says in the safety notice that, “ Ethicon will not return the ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Composite Mesh product to the market
As a result of the complications experienced by patients who used the Physiomesh medical device for their hernia surgery, numerous lawsuits are being filed. Around 1,279 personal injury lawsuits are pending in the case labeled: MDL-2782 IN RE: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation. The judge of this lawsuit, Richard W. Story issued an order on May 2018 to allow patients to preserve their mesh products for evidence during the trial.
The C-Qur mesh, manufactured initially by Atrium, but now sold by Maquet, is another defective mesh device that has been recalled. Similarly to Ethicon and Bard’ hernia mesh devices, Atrium’s C-Qur mesh was also approved by the controversial 510(k) program was sold to the public without first receiving proper safety tests.
The Omega-3 barrier of the C-Qur mesh is meant to prevent scarring; however, it has been linked to adhesions and other harmful health complications. In 2013, the FDA issued a recall for Atrium’s C-QUR Edge mesh. The FDA received complaints of the Omega-3 barrier sticking to the package lining which could cause exposure to high humidity levels and increase the infection rates.
The FDA has listed common side effects of hernia surgery complications. The most common symptoms of hernia mesh products that have been recalled include:
According to the FDA, many of these health issues are related to hernia mesh products that have been recalled.
C.R. Bard, Ethicon, and Atrium Medical Corp are all under fire with personal injury lawsuits involving their defective hernia mesh products. These manufacturers have a responsibility to design medical devices that are safe for patients. When it is discovered that one of these companies sold defective hernia mesh devices, they must issue a recall. By this time, there are usually thousands of innocent people who have already used their defective product for their hernia surgery and have suffered severe health complications. This results in numerous lawsuits being filed. Those who were harmed have the option to demand compensation to pay for the medical bills and personal injury caused by the hernia mesh complications.
The hernia mesh lawsuits claim that manufacturers such as Bard, Ethicon, and Atrium have:
If you have had hernia surgery on or after January 1, 2008, and have experienced symptoms such as bowel obstruction, seroma, hernia recurrence, or any other side effect linked to defective or recalled hernia mesh products, you may be entitled to compensation for your pain and suffering.
Patients who discover that the hernia mesh used in his or her surgery was recalled should first speak with a medical professional for medical assistance. The next step should be to contact an experienced attorney so they may review your case and give you information about receiving monetary compensation.
Settlements for hernia mesh lawsuits have provided defendants with large sums of compensation, millions of dollars in some cases. Patients who have had defective hernia mesh products used during their hernia surgery have suffered monetary damages from expensive medical bills and lost wages. These innocent patients have also experienced pain and suffering which could include temporary and permanent limitations, shortening of life, and emotional stress.
It is KBA Attorneys’ goal to help victims of this lawsuit get the necessary compensation to recover all the damages caused by these hernia mesh companies.
Do not let these hernia mesh manufacturers go unpunished. They are responsible for thousands of injuries, some of which are severe and life-threatening. Each hernia mesh case is different and should be treated separately, however past hernia mesh injury cases have awarded defendants thousands of dollars or more.
Contact a hernia mesh attorney if you or a loved one have experienced any of the below symptoms as a result of a defective hernia mesh product:
The experienced lawyers at KBA Attorneys can help.
Get your hernia mesh case evaluated for free by a legal expert. Our team works to protect the people from deceptive companies like C.R. Bard, Ethicon, and Atrium Medical Corp. Contact KBA Attorneys to learn how you could get compensation for your hernia mesh lawsuit.
Fill out this form for a FREE, immediate, Case Evaluation
Please read these Terms and Conditions ("Terms", "Terms and Conditions") carefully before using the https://www.kbaattorneys.com/ website (the "Service") operated by KBA Attorneys ("us", "we", or "our").
Your access to and use of the Service is conditioned on your acceptance of and compliance with these Terms. These Terms apply to all visitors, users and others who access or use the Service.
By accessing or using the Service you agree to be bound by these Terms. If you disagree with any part of the terms then you may not access the Service. The materials contained in this web site are protected by applicable copyright and trade mark law.
The materials and information contained within the Service is of a general, informational nature but does not constitute legal or professional advice and should not be constituted as such. Use of the Service in any way, does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Except as required by law, neither KBA Attorneys nor its affiliated firms or businesses accept any responsibility and shall not be liable for any damages (direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary), resulting from the use of this Service. This includes, but is not limited to, damages (for loss of profits, goodwill, use, data or other intangible losses) resulting from the use of or inability to use the Service or its contents or from any interruption or delay in access to the Service for whatever reason.
Note also that sending an e-mail to our office does not create a lawyer-client relationship, and none will be formed unless there is an expressed agreement between the firm and the client. Therefore, we strongly advise you against sending confidential or privileged information to us until you can establish such a relationship.
Our Service may contain links to third-party websites or services that are not owned or controlled by KBA Attorneys
KBA Attorneys has no control over, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third party websites or services. You further acknowledge and agree that KBA Attorneys shall not be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with use of or reliance on any such content, goods or services available on or through any such websites or services.
We strongly advise you to read the terms and conditions and privacy policies of any third-party websites or services that you visit.
These Terms shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of Maryland and Virgina, United States, without regard to its conflict of law provisions.
Our failure to enforce any right or provision of these Terms will not be considered a waiver of those rights. If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court, the remaining provisions of these Terms will remain in effect. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between us regarding our Service, and supersede and replace any prior agreements we might have between us regarding the Service.
We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to modify or replace these Terms at any time. If a revision is material we will try to provide at least 30 days notice prior to any new terms taking effect. What constitutes a material change will be determined at our sole discretion.
By continuing to access or use our Service after those revisions become effective, you agree to be bound by the revised terms. If you do not agree to the new terms, please stop using the Service.
If you have any questions about these Terms, please contact us.